Rose (Phu Tran)

Unfortunately Phu Tran has not made any effort to publish anything about the rose.
Yet he refused any other people publishing anything about it.
In 2005 he said " I will diagram my model correctly, but you will have to wait."
This is almost 4 years ago...That's quite some time people have been wating now.
Anyway, I read comments that said the socalled Phu Tran rose is more a kawasaki variation than a independant development of Phu Tran himself.
So, if that is true, Mr Tran's attitude is very unpleasant.
I read one of his comments in the The Origami Forum and he was very unfriendly to the whole community just because someone made a diagram of the rose as mentioned in the comments above.
A diagramm that at most a few hundred people will ever see.
Now i know that there are different opinions on this subject, but if he has no personnel interest in publishing a diagram or at least has not done so in the last 4 years, I can't even understand why he is so determined about this.
The guy who made the diagram was only trying to help the people who were begging Mr Tran to make a diagram which he coldheartedly refused.
He explained it with lack of time, but then why not make a video which takes all in all about an hour or 2?
And frankly, if he has not had the time to do so in the last 4 years, he must be the busiest man in the world, prior to The President.
He instead said things like "well, come to a convention", regardless there are people who can't just travel a few thousand miles to learn how to fold a piece of paper.
Also he said "there are disappoinments in life, learn to live with it".
He gave the impression to be rather self-opinionated and arrogant.
And he also contradicted his own statements.
He said "xy made diagram to my rose from the CP. He does NOT have my permission to distribute it." while he also said "...his diagrams are WRONG. "
If they are wrong anyway, what is the fuss about?
And as i already mentioned, i believe his rose is not an independant development, I have seen some of how it is done, and it looked in great parts like a combination of the kawasaki rose and other basic stuff.
So it is even somewhat irritating that Phu Tran is so confident that this rose is his property and his only and may not be made by anyone who has not learned it by him or someone he taught.
Not even to speak of publishing a diagram.
If Origami artists had been like that in the past, this would be an extinct tradition and certainly Mr Tran would have never even known what you can do with a piece of paper.
And I know Sara, that you will probably disagree with what I finally will say, but still let me just say that in my opinion in this rather small world of Origami fans outside of Japan, people should be less hostile to each other, and not be so determined with insisting on "this is my invention, noone may show how it is done but ME ME ME".
I am not gonna argue about that, I respect other people's opinons but i do certainly find nothing wrong if someone for example makes a non commerical video of a magic rose and puts it on youtube.
If the designer has a problem with it, he or she is free to press charges.
If that is not the case or has no chance to be successful, then there is no way to morally judge the person who made a noncommercial tutorial for the design.
If you say "It's not nice to make a free tutorial of my design" then i might say :
If you really love what you are doing it is not about the money or the fame you get from it, but the happiness it gives you and the people you share it with.
And these people acutally then will give you something you can't buy, respect and affection.
If Mozart had taught me to play the "The Magic Flute" I would certainly be both legally and morally entitled to teach others how to do it.
In person or over the internet, at least as long as i do that without making money from it.